playing along

April 2016 (13)

1 Corinthians 10:1-5

1Co 10:1 Because I do not want you to miss this, brothers — the fact that all our fathers were under that cloud, and all had passed through that sea.

1Co 10:2 And they all had been baptized in that cloud and in that sea for Moses,

1Co 10:3 and they all ate the same spiritual food he provided,

1Co 10:4 and they all drank the same spiritual drink. Because they drank from a spiritual rock that accompanied them, but the rock was Christ.

1Co 10:5 Yet God decided against many of them, because they met with catastrophe in the desert.

playing along

Paul’s warning to the Corinthians grows sharper as he turns their attention to the history of Israel. He has been urging them to pursue the Christian life with the same discipline and intentionality that athletes bring to their training. Now he reminds them of a sobering truth: belonging to a religious community does not guarantee spiritual safety. Israel’s story stands as a cautionary example.

Their ancestors had every outward privilege. They were all under the cloud of God’s presence. They all passed through the sea in the great act of deliverance. They all experienced a kind of baptism into Moses as they followed him through the waters. They all ate the manna and drank the water God miraculously provided. They participated in the same rituals, shared the same meals, and identified with the same community. From the outside, everything looked right. They appeared to be a people fully aligned with God.

But Paul exposes the tragic reality: although they had aligned themselves with God externally, God had not approved of them internally. Their hearts were not devoted to him. Their obedience was shallow. Their participation in the community was real, but their faith was not. They went through the motions, confident that their rituals and associations were enough. Yet the wilderness became their grave because their lives did not match their profession.

Paul uses this history to confront a danger lurking in Corinth. The church was filled with people who assumed that participation in Christian gatherings, baptism, and the Lord’s Supper guaranteed spiritual standing. Some believed that simply being part of the community insulated them from judgment. But Paul insists that external involvement without internal devotion leads to catastrophe. The Israelites “played along,” but their hearts were far from God. The Corinthians risked repeating the same mistake.

This warning reaches across the centuries. It is possible to attend worship, participate in sacraments, and speak the language of faith while lacking the obedience, humility, and perseverance that mark genuine devotion. Paul is not trying to unsettle sincere believers but to expose the danger of complacency. The Christian life requires more than association; it requires transformation. The privileges of the community are real, but they must be matched by a heart that seeks God, trusts him, and follows him.

Paul’s message is clear: the past is a mirror. Israel’s failure is not a distant tragedy but a present warning. The call is to sincerity, discipline, and wholehearted faith—because merely playing along is spiritually deadly.

LORD, strengthen our resolve to dedicate our lives to the faith we profess – faith in Christ our rock.

Posted in commitment, communion, discipleship, faithfulness, hypocrisy | Tagged | Leave a comment

run to take the prize

April 2016 (12)

1 Corinthians 9:24-27

1Co 9:24 Do you not know that all the runners in a stadium are running, but one receives the prize? So run to take the prize.

1Co 9:25 And each competitor must exercise all his self-control; they run to receive a mortal wreath, be we run for an immortal prize.

1Co 9:26 So I do not run uncertainly; I do not box like one who beats air.

1Co 9:27 Instead, I wear out my body and enslave it; so that after preaching to others, I myself will not be disqualified.

run to take the prize

In the athletic world of Paul’s day, the highest honor an athlete could receive was a wreath woven from leaves or branches. It was a symbol of victory, but it was also fragile. The moment it was placed on the winner’s head, it had already begun to wither. Its glory was temporary, its beauty short‑lived, and its value destined to fade. Everyone watching the games understood this. The applause would die down, the wreath would crumble, and the champion’s moment of triumph would soon be only a memory.

Paul uses that image to draw a sharp contrast between the pursuits of this world and the pursuit that defines the Christian life. The athletes of Corinth trained with intensity, discipline, and focus for a prize that could not last. But believers are called to run a race whose reward is not subject to decay. The prize held before them is nothing less than participation in the coming kingdom of God and the gift of immortality itself. This is not a metaphorical reward or a symbolic honor. Paul speaks of a real, future transformation in which mortality is swallowed up by life, and the faithful are welcomed into the eternal reign of Christ.

By invoking the imagery of the games, Paul invites the Corinthians to consider the seriousness of their own spiritual calling. If athletes devote themselves so rigorously for a fading crown, how much more should believers devote themselves to a prize that will never perish. The Christian hope is not a momentary triumph but an everlasting inheritance. It is the restoration of all things, the renewal of creation, and the resurrection of the body. It is life that cannot be touched by death, joy that cannot be diminished, and glory that cannot fade.

Paul’s encouragement is both pastoral and practical. He is calling the Corinthians to lift their eyes above the distractions, rivalries, and temporary concerns that had consumed them. Their true goal is not social status, personal freedom, or victory in theological debates. Their true goal is the kingdom that Christ will bring, the immortality he will bestow, and the fellowship with God that will endure forever.

In reminding them of this imperishable prize, Paul reorients their priorities. The Christian life is not a casual stroll but a purposeful race. The finish line is worth every sacrifice, every discipline, and every act of faithfulness, because the reward is eternal.

LORD, make us athletes fit for the ultimate prize.

 

Posted in commitment, eternal life, kingdom of God, perseverance | Tagged | Leave a comment

partnering in the product

April 2016 (11)

1 Corinthians 9:18-23

1Co 9:18 What then is my wages? That, when I evangelize, I may offer the gospel without charge, so as not to make full use of my right as regarding the gospel.

1Co 9:19 Because although I am free from all, I made myself a bondservant to everyone, in order to gain more of them.

1Co 9:20 I became to the Jews like a Jew to gain the Jews. To those under the law, like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law) to gain those under the law.

1Co 9:21 To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (not being outside the law of God but under the law of Christ) that I might win those outside the law.

1Co 9:22 I became weak to the weak in order to gain the weak. I have become all things to all people, so that by all means I may save some.

1Co 9:23 And I do all things for the sake of the gospel, that I may become a sharing partner in its product.

partnering in the product

Paul’s reflections on ministry support reach their deepest point when he turns to the question of his own “wages.” He has already argued from Scripture that those who labor in the harvest of the gospel should not be muzzled. The principle is clear: those who sow spiritual seed have a rightful claim to material support. This is not a concession but a biblical expectation woven into the life of God’s people from the beginning. Yet Paul immediately distinguishes his personal practice from the general rule. He affirms the right, then explains why he has chosen not to use it.

This leads him to the heart of the matter. If he does not receive financial support, what then is his reward? Paul answers with a clarity that reveals the depth of his calling. His wages are not measured in coins or provisions but in the fruit of the gospel itself. His reward is seeing men and women turn from darkness to light, from idols to the living God, from death to life. Every new believer, every transformed household, every congregation planted in previously pagan soil—these are the returns on his labor. This is how he participates as a partner in the harvest.

Paul does not view himself as a hired worker collecting a paycheck. He sees himself as a steward entrusted with a sacred commission. The joy of fulfilling that commission is its own compensation. When the gospel takes root in a new city, when a community of believers begins to flourish, when Christ is honored where he was previously unknown—Paul counts that as his profit. The success of the mission is the satisfaction of his soul.

This perspective reveals the purity of Paul’s motives. He is not driven by financial gain, nor is he resentful of those who receive support. His refusal to take wages in certain contexts is not a rejection of the principle but an expression of his devotion. He wants nothing to obscure the message or to give the impression that he preaches for personal benefit. His reward is bound up entirely in the advance of the gospel.

In this, Paul offers a model of ministry shaped not by entitlement but by joy. The true compensation for gospel labor is the gospel’s fruit. The true partnership is not merely financial but spiritual—sharing in the work and sharing in the harvest.

LORD, make us so eager to gain people for your kingdom that it becomes for us the wages we live for.

Posted in evangelism, ministry, missions, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

entrusted with a stewardship

April 2016 (10)

1 Corinthians 9:15-17

1Co 9:15 But I have not made use of these rights.  And I have not written these things for it to become so for me, because it would be better to die than for someone to take away my bragging right.

1Co 9:16 Because if I am merely announcing the gospel, I have no ground for bragging about that, since I am obligated to do that, because tragedy will come to me if I do not announce the gospel.

1Co 9:17 Because if I were doing this on my own, I would deserve wages. But this is not my doing. I am entrusted with a stewardship.

entrusted with a stewardship

Paul understood his calling in a way that set him apart from many of the other workers announcing the gospel. Others entered ministry by a willing choice. They felt compelled by love for Christ, stirred by conviction, and eager to serve. Their commitment was sincere, and their labor was real. But Paul’s path had been dramatically different. He had not volunteered. He had been confronted, arrested, and redirected by the risen Christ on the Damascus road. From that moment forward, he no longer regarded himself as a free agent choosing a vocation. He saw himself as a bondservant—someone placed under orders, entrusted with a stewardship that was not optional.

This sense of divine assignment shaped every aspect of his ministry. He did not view himself as an independent preacher who could decide how to structure his life or how to fund his work. He saw himself as a manager of his Master’s affairs, responsible for carrying out a commission that had been given directly by Christ. Because of this, he was reluctant to receive wages from others. It was not that he believed support was wrong; he had already affirmed that those who preach the gospel have a right to live from the gospel. But Paul’s own situation was unique. His calling had come with such force and clarity that he felt compelled to devote every resource he possessed—time, energy, skill, and even his trade—to the mission entrusted to him.

His tentmaking was not a side job or a fallback plan. It was part of his stewardship. The same hands that crafted tents were the hands that planted churches. The same labor that earned his bread also removed obstacles to the gospel. Paul understood that in Gentile regions, accepting financial support too early could compromise the message. So he used his trade as a means of advancing the mission without burdening new believers or confusing outsiders.

Everything in Paul’s life after Damascus flowed from that encounter. His singleness, his sacrifices, his tireless travel, his refusal to take support in certain contexts—all of it was shaped by the conviction that he belonged entirely to Christ. His ministry was not a career but a commission. His choices were not expressions of personal preference but acts of obedience. And in that obedience, he found both his authority and his authenticity.

LORD, may we know the joy of serving you as your bondservants, investing all we have in your work.

 

 

Posted in commitment, ministry, Paul, servanthood, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

a gospel first decision

April 2016 (9)

1 Corinthians 9:11-14

1Co 9:11 If we have planted spiritual gifts among you, would it not be great if we will reap material benefits from you?

1Co 9:12 If others have the right to share in the product from you, don’t we even more? But we have not made use of this right. Instead we put up with all these inconveniences so that we may not prevent the gospel of Christ from taking root.

1Co 9:13 Don’t you know that the holy workers eat what is prepared for the temple, and those who serve at the altar have their share in the offerings of the altar?

1Co 9:14 The Lord instructed the same thing — that those who are announcing the gospel should live from the gospel.

a gospel first decision

When Jesus commissioned his messengers to proclaim the nearness of God’s kingdom, he instructed them not to carry extra money, clothing, or provisions. His words in Matthew 10 make the principle unmistakable: those who minister the gospel should expect to be sustained by those who receive the gospel. Their needs would be met not through self‑reliance but through the hospitality and gratitude of those who were spiritually blessed by their work. This was not an emergency measure or a temporary rule. It reflected a divine pattern woven into the life of God’s people: the worker deserves his food.

Paul fully embraced that principle. He knew that Scripture affirmed it, that Jesus himself had taught it, and that the early church practiced it. Yet when he stepped into Gentile territory for the first time, he discovered a reality that required a different approach. These communities had no background in the Scriptures, no understanding of the obligations of God’s people, and no instinct to support those who preached the gospel. To expect financial provision from them at the outset would have risked misunderstanding the message. It might have appeared that Paul was a wandering philosopher seeking patronage, or a religious entrepreneur hoping to profit from his teaching.

So Paul made a deliberate, strategic choice. He laid aside a legitimate right for the sake of the mission. He worked with his hands, supported himself through tentmaking, and refused to accept contributions while the gospel was taking root. His decision was not a rejection of the principle Jesus taught but an application of it in a context where receiving support would have hindered rather than helped the work. It was a gospel‑first decision, shaped by a desire to remove every obstacle that might prevent Gentiles from hearing and believing.

Paul’s example reveals a profound truth about ministry. Rights exist, and they matter. Scripture affirms them. But love sometimes calls for the voluntary surrender of those rights when the advance of the gospel requires it. Paul’s tentmaking was not a sign of lesser spirituality or diminished authority. It was a costly expression of devotion, a willingness to bear personal burden so that others might receive eternal blessing.

LORD, may we put the gospel first when making life decisions.

 

Posted in discernment, gospel, Paul | Tagged | Leave a comment

ploughing with confidence

April 2016 (8)

1 Corinthians 9:8-10

1Co 9:8 Am I speaking from mere human logic, or does not the Law say these things?

1Co 9:9 Because it is written in the Law by Moses, “You will not muzzle an ox while it is threshing.” It is not the oxen that God is interested in.

1Co 9:10 Instead, isn’t He really saying it for us? Yes, this is written for us, because he who ploughs ought to plough with confidence, and he who threshes should do so with confidence of sharing the product.

ploughing with confidence

Paul’s discussion of financial support in ministry exposes yet another tension within the Corinthian congregations. It appears that two opposing groups may have been pulling against each other, each convinced of its own correctness yet both missing Paul’s point. On one side were the practically minded, who may have viewed Paul’s refusal to accept financial support as irresponsible or even harmful. If he worked without pay, would that not set an unrealistic precedent for future ministers? Would it not encourage congregations to undervalue the labor of those who preach and teach? On the other side were those who admired Paul’s refusal to take support, interpreting it as a sign of superior spirituality. To them, Paul’s tentmaking was proof that he trusted God more deeply than others who received regular support.

Paul refuses to let either faction define the issue. He begins by affirming a principle rooted in Scripture itself: those who labor in the ministry have a legitimate right to be supported by the people of God. He appeals to the law of Moses, to common agricultural practice, and to the pattern established by the Lord Jesus. The worker is worthy of his wages. The ox is not muzzled while it treads out the grain. Those who sow spiritual seed should expect to reap material support. Paul’s argument is not theoretical; it is grounded in the long‑standing pattern of God’s people caring for those who serve them.

Yet Paul also insists that he personally chose not to exercise that right in Corinth. His refusal was not a rejection of the principle but a strategic decision shaped by the unique circumstances of his ministry there. He wanted to remove every possible obstacle to the gospel. He wanted no one to accuse him of preaching for profit. His choice was voluntary, not normative. The right remained intact even when he declined to use it.

This distinction is crucial. Paul’s personal sacrifice does not invalidate the broader principle. It remains right and good for churches to support those who devote themselves to the work of preaching, teaching, and shepherding. A congregation that honors its ministers with generous provision demonstrates both gratitude and maturity. Such support affirms the value of the gospel and the labor required to proclaim it faithfully.

Paul’s example teaches that freedom in ministry includes both the right to receive support and the freedom to relinquish that right when love or mission requires it. But the underlying principle stands firm: the church does well when it cares well for those who serve.

LORD, thank you for those who serve you and us by ploughing in our field.

 

Posted in church, employment, ministry, missions, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

unique — so genuine

April 2016 (7)

1 Corinthians 9:1-7

1Co 9:1 Am I not free? Am I not a missionary? Have I not seen Jesus our Lord? Are you not my work in the Lord?

1Co 9:2 If to others I am not a missionary, at least I am to you, because you are the seal of my missions work in the Lord.

1Co 9:3 My defending argument to those who are examining me is this:

1Co 9:4 Don’t we have the right to eat and drink?

1Co 9:5 Don’t we have the right to bring along a Christian wife like the other missionaries, the Lord’s brothers, and Cephas do?

1Co 9:6 Or do Barnabas and I alone have no right to keep from working?

1Co 9:7 Who makes war at their own expense — ever? Who plants a vineyard and does not eat its fruit? Or who shepherds a flock and does not consume the milk from the flock?

unique — so genuine

Paul’s indignation in this section of the letter is not the irritation of a thin‑skinned leader but the wounded concern of a spiritual father whose integrity has been unfairly questioned. The very people who should have been most grateful for his ministry had begun to cast doubt on his legitimacy. Corinth owed its existence as a Christian community to the labor of Paul and his team, yet some within the congregation were now suggesting that he did not meet the qualifications of a true missionary. Their criticisms were not theological but personal and superficial.

One accusation centered on Paul’s decision to support himself through tentmaking while ministering in Corinth. Instead of receiving financial support from the church, he chose manual labor so that no one could claim he preached the gospel for personal gain. Ironically, this sacrificial choice was twisted into a sign of inferiority. Other missionaries received support; Paul did not. Therefore, some argued, he must not be a genuine apostle.

Another criticism targeted his singleness. Prominent Christian leaders such as Peter were married, and some in Corinth used this as a benchmark for legitimacy. Paul’s unmarried status, they claimed, made him an outlier and therefore suspect. In their minds, deviation from the norm was evidence of deficiency.

Paul responds by turning their logic on its head. He affirms that he had every right to receive financial support and every right to marry. These were legitimate freedoms granted to those who serve the gospel. Yet he voluntarily relinquished those rights for the sake of the mission. His refusal to take support was not a sign of weakness but a deliberate strategy to remove obstacles to the gospel. His singleness was not a flaw but a chosen form of devotion that allowed him to serve with greater mobility and focus.

Far from disqualifying him, these distinctive choices reveal the authenticity of his calling. He was not driven by comfort, reputation, or conformity but by the advancement of Christ’s kingdom. His uniqueness was not evidence of failure but of faithfulness. In a community tempted to measure leaders by worldly standards, Paul reminds them that true apostolic authority is marked by sacrifice, humility, and a willingness to lay aside personal rights for the good of others.

LORD, you have blessed us with a variety of servants who faithfully work among us.  Teach us to accept all of them as gifts from you, no matter how different they are from one another.

 

Posted in church, genuineness, missions, Paul | Tagged | Leave a comment

protecting the weak

April 2016 (6)

1 Corinthians 8:10-13

1Co 8:10 Because if someone sees you, the one who has this knowledge, reclining where an idol is displayed, won’t his weak conscience be encouraged to eat food offered to idols?

1Co 8:11 Because this weak one – by your knowledge – is being destroyed – this brother for whom Christ died!

1Co 8:12 Now when you are sinning like this against the brothers and punch their weak conscience, you are sinning against Christ.

1Co 8:13 For this reason, if food is causing my brother to fall, I will not ever eat meat for the rest of my life, so that I won’t cause my brother to fall.

protecting the weak

The Corinthian situation reveals how easily a good doctrine can be mishandled when love is not guiding its application. Within the network of congregations in Corinth, a confident faction emphasized the freedom believers possess in Christ. Their theology was sound: idols are nothing, food is morally neutral, and the gospel has released God’s people from the ritual restrictions of the old covenant. Because of this, some among the “strong” felt perfectly at ease walking into the marketplace, purchasing inexpensive meat that had previously been used in pagan ceremonies, and enjoying it without a second thought. To them, it was simply a practical decision grounded in correct theology.

Paul does not dispute their understanding. He agrees that the meat itself carries no spiritual contamination. Yet he presses them to look beyond the correctness of their doctrine and consider the impact of their behavior. Corinth was filled with new believers who had only recently turned from paganism. Their former lives were saturated with sacrifices, idols, and rituals. For them, seeing a respected Christian purchasing meat from a stall associated with idol worship could easily stir confusion or even draw them back toward old patterns. What the strong regarded as harmless could become, for the weak, a spiritual snare.

This is why Paul reframes the entire issue around love. Freedom is real, but it is not ultimate. Knowledge is valuable, but it is not supreme. The spiritual well‑being of a brother or sister takes precedence over personal liberty. Paul goes so far as to say that he would gladly abstain from meat altogether if doing so would protect a vulnerable believer from stumbling. The principle is clear: failing to guard the conscience of a weaker brother is not merely inconsiderate; it is a sin against Christ himself, who purchased that brother with his own blood.

Paul’s example exposes the heart of Christian maturity. Strength is not measured by how much freedom one can exercise but by how willingly one limits that freedom for the sake of another’s growth. A community shaped by this kind of love becomes a place where the strong protect the weak, where liberty is guided by compassion, and where the good of others is held above personal preference.

LORD, help us to protect our Christian family, even sustaining from things we are free to do – for their sake.

 

Posted in animism, conscience, consideration of others, freedom, idolatry | Tagged | Leave a comment

considering the consciences

 

April 2016 (5)

1 Corinthians 8:7-9

1Co 8:7 However, this knowledge is not in all of us to the same degree. In fact, some have habitually thought like idolaters until now, so when they eat food that has been offered to an idol, their weak conscience is corrupted.

1Co 8:8 But a food will not really affect our standing in God’s sight. Neither are we lacking his blessing if we do not eat it, nor do we gain his blessing if we do eat it.

1Co 8:9 But you all had better see to it that your right to choose in this matter does not become a cause of tripping up the weak ones.

considering the consciences

Many of the tensions in the Corinthian churches did not arise from false doctrine but from people who held correct doctrine and applied it without regard for the spiritual well‑being of others. The issue of meat offered to idols is a clear example. Some believers understood the gospel rightly: idols are nothing, food does not commend anyone to God, and Christ has freed his people from the dietary restrictions of the old covenant. Confident in that truth, they felt no hesitation in purchasing the inexpensive meat that had once been part of pagan rituals. To them, it was simply food, stripped of any spiritual significance by the reality of the one true God.

Paul does not correct their theology. He affirms it. Their understanding of Christian liberty was sound. The problem lay not in what they believed but in how they behaved. Their actions failed to take into account the consciences of fellow believers who did not share the same level of confidence. Some in the congregation still associated that meat with idolatry. For them, eating it felt like participating in something spiritually corrupt. When the stronger believers exercised their freedom without restraint, they placed unnecessary pressure on the weaker ones, tempting them to act against their own conscience and wounding them in the process.

This dynamic is not confined to the first century. It is alive in the modern church as well. Many today are quick to assert personal rights—rights to entertainment, to consumption, to lifestyle choices—without pausing to consider how those choices appear to younger or less mature believers who are watching closely. A generation is growing up within the church, observing the habits of those who claim to follow Christ. In some cases, what is defended as freedom may be interpreted as inconsistency or even hypocrisy. The issue is not whether certain activities are inherently sinful but whether the unrestrained exercise of liberty becomes a stumbling block to others.

Paul’s counsel invites a posture of humility and self‑restraint. Christian freedom is real, but it is never an excuse for indifference. Love limits liberty for the sake of another’s spiritual good. A community shaped by that kind of love becomes a place where believers grow in confidence rather than confusion, and where the strong use their strength not to flaunt their rights but to protect the vulnerable.

LORD, give us wisdom as to how we display our freedoms.

 

 

 

Posted in conscience, consideration of others, hypocrisy | Tagged | Leave a comment

imposters

April 2016 (4)

1 Corinthians 8:4-6

1Co 8:4 So, about eating food which has been offered to idols, we know that “an idol in this world is nothing,” and “there no God, except for the one.”

1Co 8:5 Because even though there are those spoken of as gods in the sky or on the land – yes, there are many such gods and many lords —

1Co 8:6 but to us – one God, the Father, from whom came all things, and we are for him, and one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom came all things, and we live because of him.

imposters

Paul’s words still speak into a world where idolatry is not a relic of ancient history but a present and powerful reality. Across continents and cultures, countless communities remain bound to systems of belief in which carved images, ancestral spirits, or localized deities are treated as the key to prosperity, protection, or healing. The outward forms vary, but the underlying impulse is the same: people turn to these figures because they believe such beings can be persuaded, appeased, or manipulated into granting personal desires. The term “worship” hardly fits, for the relationship is transactional rather than reverent. These gods “exist” only because people imagine them, carve them, and sustain them through ritual. They are projections of human longing, fear, and self-interest.

Paul’s contrast could not be sharper. Against the backdrop of many gods and many lords, he proclaims one God and one Lord Jesus Christ. The difference is not merely numerical; it is ontological. The idols exist because people create them. Humanity exists because the living God created and sustains it. Idols depend on human imagination. Humanity depends on divine will. Idols are shaped by human hands. Humanity is shaped by the breath of God. Idols are invoked to serve human purposes. Believers exist for God’s purposes.

Paul’s confession reorients the entire conversation. The Corinthian believers were surrounded by a culture saturated with images, temples, sacrifices, and spiritual intermediaries. Yet Paul reminds them that their identity is rooted not in the marketplace of competing deities but in the Father who made them and the Son who redeemed them. The Lord Jesus Christ is not an image fashioned from stone or metal but the true image of the invisible God, the One who reveals the Father and brings his people into genuine relationship with him.

This truth renders all substitutes unnecessary. No carved figure can mediate divine presence. No ancestral spirit can secure blessing. No ritual manipulation can produce life. The living God has already acted decisively in Christ, drawing his people into fellowship with himself. That reality frees believers from fear, from superstition, and from the need to control the spiritual world. It anchors them in a relationship grounded not in human invention but in divine grace.

LORD, purge from us the stupidity of idolatry in all its forms.

 

 

 

Posted in animism, dependence upon God, discernment, idolatry, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment