freedom and order

May 2016 (23)

1 Corinthians 14:26-28

1Co 14:26 What is it to be, then, brothers? Whenever you come together, each one of you has a psalm to sing, has a lesson to teach, has a mystery to reveal, has a message in another language, has an translation. All these things must be done for building up.
1Co 14:27 If someone speaks in another language, limit it to only two or at most three, and each in turn, and one must translate.
1Co 14:28 But if there is no translator, he must be silent within the assembly, but he must speak to himself and to God.

freedom and order

Paul’s description of worship in Corinth reveals a remarkable balance—freedom without chaos, openness without disorder, participation without competition. The early Christian gatherings were not built around a single preacher delivering a monologue from a pulpit. Instead, they were dynamic, participatory assemblies in which many could contribute as the Spirit prompted. This freedom was not a flaw; it was one of the strengths of the early church. It allowed room for genuine spiritual expression, mutual encouragement, and the sharing of diverse gifts.

But freedom without boundaries can quickly become confusion. That is exactly what had begun to happen in Corinth. Certain groups or individuals were dominating the gatherings, often through dramatic displays of linguistic ability. Others were speaking over one another. Still others were contributing in ways that did not build up the body. The result was not a richer worship experience but a fractured one. Instead of unity, there was noise. Instead of edification, there was bewilderment. Instead of a shared focus on God, there was a competition for attention.

Paul’s response is not to shut down the freedom but to shape it. He describes a worship environment where the Spirit is free to inspire anyone, yet where the community exercises maturity, restraint, and discernment. Contributions are welcomed, but they are offered in turn. Prophetic words are shared, but they are weighed. Messages in other languages are permitted, but only when interpretation is available. Everything is done with the goal of clarity, peace, and mutual strengthening.

This combination—freedom and order—is the heart of Paul’s vision. The Spirit is not stifled, but neither is the assembly overwhelmed by disorder. The louder voices do not drown out the quieter ones. The more dominant personalities do not seize control of the gathering. The service is structured in such a way that confusion is minimized and harmony is preserved.

In Corinth, the problem was not the presence of freedom but the absence of maturity. The gatherings had become arenas for display rather than spaces for shared worship. Paul’s corrective is gentle but firm: the Spirit’s work is not chaotic. The Spirit’s gifts are not given to create disorder. True spirituality expresses itself in ways that strengthen the whole body, not just the individual.

The early church’s freedom was a gift. Paul’s guidance ensured that the gift did not become a liability.

LORD, grant us freedom in our worship, and the wisdom to follow Paul’s advice and keep it ortderly.

Posted in consideration of others, spiritual gifts, worship | Tagged | Leave a comment

what if everybody…

May 2016 (21)

1 Corinthians 14:23-25

1Co 14:23 For this reason, if the whole assembly comes together, and all of you are speaking in other languages, and newcomers or unbelievers come in, would they not say that you are all maniacs?
1Co 14:24 But if you all are prophesying, and some unbeliever or newcomer comes in, he is going to be convicted by you all, his resolve will be challenged by you all.
1Co 14:25 The things hidden in his heart will become exposed, and as a result he will fall facedown and worship God, announcing, “God is really among you.”

what if everybody…

Paul brings his argument to a sharp and practical point by asking the Corinthians to imagine the logical outcome of their current behavior. A problem had developed in several of the fellowships: individuals were bursting out in praise or prayer in languages unfamiliar to the rest of the congregation. The speaker understood the words, but no one else did. What was intended as worship became, for everyone else, confusion. Instead of strengthening the body, it fractured the moment.

At this point Paul pauses and poses a simple but devastating question: What if everyone did exactly what these individuals were doing? The answer exposes the issue. If the entire assembly were speaking prophetically—communicating God’s truth in a way the whole group could understand—the result would be conviction, clarity, and even conversion. Outsiders would hear the message plainly and be drawn toward Christ.

But if the entire assembly were speaking in languages no one else understood, the effect would be the opposite. Newcomers and unbelievers would walk into a gathering filled with sounds that carried no meaning for them. Instead of encountering the gospel, they would encounter bewilderment. Instead of sensing the presence of God, they would assume the community had lost its senses. Paul’s phrase captures the reaction vividly: they would conclude the church was full of maniacs.

This contrast reveals Paul’s central concern: what happens in the gathered church matters. Worship is not a private display performed in public. It is a communal act meant to build up the whole body and to present the gospel clearly to those who enter. When speech is unintelligible, the church is not strengthened and the unbeliever is not helped. Confusion replaces edification, and the mission of the church is hindered.

Paul’s reasoning is pastoral, missionary, and deeply practical. The Spirit’s gifts are real, but they must be used in ways that serve the community and advance the gospel. Anything that obscures the message or disrupts the unity of the gathering must be set aside. The Corinthians had allowed personal expression to overshadow communal benefit. Paul calls them back to a better way—one in which clarity, understanding, and love guide every act of worship.

LORD, give us the wisdom to display your wisdom when we worship.

Posted in church, discernment, spiritual gifts, worship | Tagged | Leave a comment

baby talk revisited

May 2016 (20)

1 Corinthians 14:20-22

1Co 14:20 Brothers, stop being children in your way of thinking, instead, be minors when it comes to evil, but in your way of thinking, start being mature.
1Co 14:21 Scripture says (in the Law) “By people with strange tongues and by the lips of strangers I will speak to this people, yet they will not even listen to me in this way,” says the Lord.
1Co 14:22 So then, foreign languages are a sign indicating not believers but unbelievers. Prophecy, however, is not a sign indicating unbelievers but believers.

baby talk revisited

Isaiah’s experience with Judah’s nobility provides a striking parallel to the situation in Corinth. Isaiah delivered God’s word with clarity, simplicity, and persistence, yet the leaders dismissed his message as childish and beneath their sophistication. They claimed it was too simple, too repetitive, too basic. In reality, the problem was not the message but their unwillingness to hear it. Confusion became a convenient excuse for rejecting the prophet. If the message could be labeled simplistic or unclear, the messenger could be safely ignored.

Paul draws directly from Isaiah 28 when addressing the Corinthians’ misuse of languages. The Corinthians were creating the very situation Isaiah faced: a spiritual environment where confusion allowed people—especially unbelievers—to dismiss the message. When foreign languages were used without interpretation, the result was not edification but bewilderment. Believers gained nothing, and unbelievers gained an excuse to walk away untouched by the gospel. Instead of opening doors for the message, the practice closed them.

Paul’s concern was not the existence of the linguistic gift but the immaturity governing its use. Immaturity insisted, “This ability belongs to me, and it will be exercised whenever I choose.” Immaturity treated the gift as a personal possession, a badge of spiritual status, or a performance to be admired. Immaturity placed the individual above the community and the display above the mission.

Maturity, however, spoke differently. Maturity recognized the gift as a tool entrusted by God for a specific purpose. Maturity said, “This ability is valuable, but it will be used only when it advances the gospel and strengthens the church.” Maturity understood that a gift misused becomes a barrier rather than a blessing. Maturity placed the mission above personal expression and the edification of others above the desire to impress.

Paul’s appeal is pastoral and missional. The Spirit’s gifts are never ends in themselves. They are instruments for building up the body and extending the gospel. When used in ways that create confusion, they lose their purpose. When used in ways that promote clarity, unity, and understanding, they fulfill the intention of the God who gave them.

Isaiah’s audience used confusion to avoid God’s word. Paul warned the Corinthians not to give unbelievers the same excuse. True spirituality seeks clarity, builds up the church, and removes every obstacle that might hinder the gospel.

LORD, make us mature in the way we utilise your gifts.

see https://marmsky.com/2015/04/17/baby-talk/

Posted in consideration of others, spiritual gifts, worship | Tagged | Leave a comment

the focus of worship

May 2016 (19)

1 Corinthians 14:16-19

1Co 14:16 If this does not happen — if you are only praising in the spirit — how can a person filling the place beside you who is not skilled in the language say “Amen” to your thanksgiving, since he does not know what you are saying?
1Co 14:17 Because you are giving thanks appropriately, but the other person is not being built up.
1Co 14:18 I thank God that I speak in other languages more than all of you;
1Co 14:19 but within an assembly I want to speak five words with my mind, in order to teach others also, rather than 10,000 words in another language.

the focus of worship

Paul’s comments here reveal both his humility and his pastoral wisdom. From his own writings, it is clear that he operated comfortably in several languages—Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, Latin, and likely others encountered during his missionary travels. When he stated that he spoke in languages more than all the Corinthians, it was not exaggeration. The linguists in the Corinthian assemblies, impressive as they were, could not match Paul’s breadth of ability. Yet Paul made a deliberate choice never to showcase that ability in worship gatherings.

For Paul, the issue was not linguistic skill but the purpose of worship. Worship was never meant to be a platform for demonstrating intelligence, education, or spiritual prowess. Worship was a communal act directed toward God, not a performance designed to elevate the worshipper. When Paul prayed aloud, his desire was that those around him could join in, affirming the prayer with their “Amen.” That simple affirmation required understanding. If the congregation could not understand the words being spoken, they could not participate. The prayer remained private even though it was spoken publicly.

This is why Paul refused to pray or sing in a foreign language during corporate worship, even though he had every ability to do so. He understood that public worship is, by definition, public ministry. It is an act of service offered for the good of the gathered community. Anything that draws attention to the individual rather than to God undermines the purpose of the gathering. Anything that isolates the worshipper from the congregation, even unintentionally, weakens the unity of the body.

Paul’s example exposes the heart of the problem in Corinth. The believers who prayed or sang in foreign languages during worship were not necessarily acting maliciously, but their actions created confusion and drew attention to themselves. The result was a fractured worship experience in which only one person was blessed while the rest of the congregation remained silent and uninvolved.

Paul’s approach offers a corrective: true spirituality is not measured by displays of giftedness but by the ability to draw others into the worship of God. The most gifted person in the room may be the one who chooses simplicity for the sake of the community. The most spiritual act may be the one that allows others to participate fully. In Paul’s vision, worship is never a stage for personal brilliance. It is a shared offering, centered on God, accessible to all, and marked by humility and love.

LORD, help us to get out of the way so you can be worshipped. May our worship teach others about you.

Posted in consideration of others, spiritual gifts, worship | Tagged | Leave a comment

fruitful worship

May 2016 (18)

1 Corinthians 14:13-15

1Co 14:13 That is why the one speaking in another language should pray that he translates it.
1Co 14:14 If I am praying in another language, my spirit is praying, but my mind is not producing fruit.
1Co 14:15 What should be happening? I will pray in the spirit, but I will also pray with the mind. I will sing praise with the spirit, but I will sing praise also with the mind.

fruitful worship

Paul now turns to a very practical distinction: the difference between worship offered in a foreign language and worship translated so that the gathered church can share in its blessing. A believer might pray or sing in a language learned naturally or granted by the Spirit, and that act of worship can be deeply meaningful so long as the worshipper understands the words being spoken. Paul refers to this as praying or singing “with the spirit”—worship that flows from sincere devotion expressed through a language the worshipper comprehends.

Yet this practice had become a source of confusion in Corinth. Worship offered in a language unknown to the congregation left the rest of the believers silent, disconnected, and unable to join in. The worshipper might be blessed, but the church was not. For Paul, that imbalance was unacceptable. Worship in the assembly must build up the whole body, not only the individual. Because of this, he urges the Corinthians to pray and sing “with the mind” as well. In this context, praying or singing with the mind means adding interpretation—translating the prayer or song so that others can understand and be edified.

Paul’s emphasis on the mind does not diminish spiritual fervor; it directs spiritual fervor toward communal benefit. A fruitful mind is not merely a mind that grasps meaning internally. A fruitful mind is one that communicates what it understands, turning private devotion into shared encouragement. When understanding is shared, worship becomes a ministry rather than a solitary experience.

This principle fits Paul’s larger argument throughout the chapter. The Spirit’s gifts are never meant to isolate believers from one another or create spiritual spectators. They are meant to strengthen the community. Worship that cannot be understood cannot edify, and worship that cannot edify cannot fulfill the Spirit’s purpose for the gathered church.

Paul’s vision is clear: spiritual vitality and intellectual clarity are not opposites. They belong together. When worship is both heartfelt and intelligible, the whole church is drawn into the experience. When understanding is added to devotion, the result is a community strengthened in faith, united in praise, and enriched by the shared fruit of the Spirit’s work.

LORD, make us fruitful worshippers, who seek to bless others by sharing our prayers and songs with them.

Posted in spiritual gifts, worship | Tagged | Leave a comment

edification is spiritual, confusion is not

May 2016 (17)

1 Corinthians 14:10-12

1Co 14:10 There are probably a great many families of languages in the world, and nothing spoken is unintelligible.
1Co 14:11 This means that if I do not have the ability to understand the language, I will be a barbarian to the speaker, and the speaker will be a barbarian to me.
1Co 14:12 For this reason, you also, since you are seeking spiritual things, you should seek to get better at building up the church.

edification is spiritual, confusion is not

Paul’s argument in this section depends on a simple but often‑overlooked observation: the “tongues” he describes are real human languages—languages that exist “in the world,” each carrying meaning for those who naturally speak them. These languages are not mystical sounds or private spiritual syllables. They are communicative tools. When spoken to the right audience, they convey the gospel with clarity and power. But when spoken outside that audience, they lose their function. They become noise. They create what Paul calls barbaroi—outsiders, people left standing on the outside of understanding. In that setting, the speaker becomes a “barbarian” to the listeners, and the listeners become “barbarians” to the speaker. The result is confusion, not edification.

This is the heart of Paul’s concern. The Corinthian assemblies had individuals with genuine linguistic abilities, but these abilities were being displayed in the wrong context. The result was not spiritual enrichment but bewilderment. Confusion, in Paul’s view, is not a mark of the Spirit’s presence. Confusion does not build up the church. Confusion does not reveal Christ. Confusion does not strengthen faith. It only isolates, divides, and distracts.

Edification, on the other hand, is deeply spiritual. Edification requires understanding. Understanding requires intelligible speech. And intelligible speech requires that the message be delivered in a language the listeners actually know. This is why Paul consistently elevates prophecy in the gathered assembly: prophecy communicates. Prophecy strengthens. Prophecy consoles. Prophecy builds up the body because it speaks truth in a form the whole body can grasp.

The principle Paul lays down is both pastoral and practical. If a community desires an atmosphere that reflects genuine spirituality, practices that generate confusion must be set aside. Practices that promote clarity, unity, and mutual strengthening must be embraced. Spirituality is not measured by how dramatic something appears, but by how effectively it communicates Christ and builds up the church.

Paul’s vision is simple: the Spirit’s work is always intelligible, always purposeful, always directed toward the good of the community. Where understanding flourishes, spirituality flourishes. Where confusion reigns, the Spirit’s intention has been lost.

LORD, give us the courage to stop doing things that syfle edification.

Posted in consideration of others, spiritual gifts | Tagged | Leave a comment

speaking into the air

May 2016 (16)

1 Corinthians 14:7-9

1Co 14:7 Even soulless objects that are used to give off a sound — whether a wind or a stringed instrument — if it does not play the tunes clearly, how will anyone recognise what is blown or strummed?
1Co 14:8 Because, if a bugle gives off an unclear sound, who will get ready for battle?
1Co 14:9 In the same way, if you use your tongue for unclear speech, how will what is spoken be known? Because you will just be speaking into the air.

speaking into the air


In the previous reflection, the claim was made that the common modern idea of “tongues” as an ecstatic, unintelligible utterance does not match Paul’s teaching. That view—once embraced and taught with conviction—still holds a strong place in many Christian circles. Yet the passage under consideration pushes firmly against that interpretation. Paul described speech that cannot be understood by anyone present as “speaking into the air,” a phrase that signals futility rather than spirituality. He did not deny that such sounds might occur, but he refused to classify them as a meaningful ministry of the Spirit. For Paul, a gift that produces no understanding produces no edification, and a gift that produces no edification has missed its purpose.

Paul’s description of the genuine gift is far more grounded and far more practical. The Spirit‑given ability he had in mind was the capacity to proclaim the gospel in a real human language that was not one’s native tongue. This ability had clear missionary value. It allowed the message of Christ to cross linguistic boundaries without delay, enabling the church to reach people who otherwise would not hear the gospel in their own language. In that context—speaking to someone who actually understood the language being used—the gift became a powerful offering to God.

The problem in Corinth was not the gift itself but the setting in which it was being used. When this linguistic ability was displayed inside the congregation, where most believers could not understand the language being spoken, the result was confusion rather than edification. The message might have been spiritually authentic, but it remained inaccessible. Paul therefore urged those with this gift not to showcase it in the assembly. Without interpretation, the words became indistinct sound—real language, but meaningless to the hearers.

Paul’s counsel reflects a consistent principle running through the entire chapter: the Spirit gives gifts for the good of others. A gift that does not communicate cannot build up the church. A gift that cannot be understood cannot strengthen faith. The Corinthians had turned a missionary tool into a badge of spiritual prestige, and Paul redirected them toward a better way. The right gift, offered in the right context, becomes a true act of love. The same gift, used for display, becomes empty noise.

Paul’s teaching remains clear: the Spirit’s gifts are meant to communicate Christ, not to obscure him.


LORD, may we be considerate in our ministries, not doing them just for show for those would not benefit from them.

Posted in consideration of others, discernment, spiritual gifts, worship | Tagged | Leave a comment

tongues are for understanding

May 2016 (15)

1 Corinthians 14:4-6

1Co 14:4 The one speaking in another language builds himself us, but the one prophesying builds up the church.
1Co 14:5 I wish all of you spoke in other languages, but I wish even more that you prophesied. The one prophesying is greater than the one speaking in other languages, unless he interprets so that the church may be built up.
1Co 14:6 But now, brothers, if I come to you speaking in other languages, how will I make you gain from that, unless I speak to you with a revelation or knowledge or prophecy or teaching?

tongues are for understanding

Paul affirms that the linguistic gifts in Corinth were real, valuable, and genuinely useful in the right setting. These believers had a legitimate ministry when they used their language abilities to communicate the gospel across cultural and linguistic boundaries. When an unbeliever who spoke one of those languages heard the message, the gift became an offering to God—an act of mission, a bridge built by the Spirit.

But inside the gathered fellowship, the situation changed. Most believers could not understand those languages. A message spoken in an unfamiliar tongue might be spiritually authentic, but it remained a mystery to the listeners. It could not edify, strengthen, or comfort them. Paul’s concern was not the gift itself but the effect it produced. A gift that leaves the church confused rather than nourished is being used out of place.

This is why Paul encourages prophecy in the assembly. Prophetic speech—whether it takes the form of unveiling a mystery, explaining Scripture, offering a warning, or giving encouragement—has one crucial advantage: it is understood. It reaches the mind and heart of the listeners. It builds up the community. And if an interpreter is present, then even a message in another language can serve the same purpose, because interpretation transforms mystery into meaning.

This context makes it clear that the popular idea of Paul referring to ecstatic, unintelligible utterances is a misunderstanding. Paul never suggests that the Spirit gives someone a supernatural ability to speak in a language that no one on earth can understand. That would contradict the entire argument he is making. The Spirit’s gifts are given for the good of others, not for private display. Paul consistently urges believers to use gifts that communicate, gifts that strengthen the church, gifts that advance the gospel.

The principle is simple: love governs the use of gifts. Love asks what will help the listeners. Love chooses clarity over spectacle. Love directs every gift toward the building up of the body. When the Corinthians used their linguistic abilities to impress one another, the gift became empty. When they used those abilities to reach the lost or edify the church through interpretation, the gift became a true offering to God.

Paul’s vision is practical and pastoral: the right gift, in the right context, offered in love, becomes a powerful instrument of the Spirit.

LORD, give us the wisdom to minister to others in such a way as to lead them to understand you.

Posted in ministry, spiritual gifts | Tagged | Leave a comment

chasing love while giving gifts

May 2016 (14)

1 Corinthians 14:1-3

1Co 14:1 You should chase love relentlessly, while still seeking to offer the gifts, especially so that you can prophesy.
1Co 14:2 Because the one speaking in a different language cannot communicate with his colleague, but to God, because no one of his colleagues understands him, but he speaks mysteries by the Spirit.
1Co 14:3 But the person prophesying speaks to his colleagues for their edification and encouragement and consolation.

chasing love while giving gifts

Paul now turns to a very specific problem in Corinth: the misuse of linguistic gifts. The fellowships included believers who could speak multiple languages—and they took great pride in these abilities. The problem was not the gift itself but the way it was being used. When a gifted linguist spoke in an unfamiliar language during worship, the unbeliever who shared that language might benefit, because the gospel was reaching someone who otherwise could not understand it. In that moment, the gift became an offering to God, a tool for mission, a bridge across cultural and linguistic barriers.

But for the rest of the congregation, those same words were unintelligible. They sounded like mysteries—real spiritual utterances, but without meaning for the gathered believers. The gift was genuine, but the context was wrong. It did not edify, strengthen, or console the church. It became impressive noise rather than spiritual nourishment.

By contrast, when a prophet spoke, the entire assembly understood. The message could build up the weary, encourage the discouraged, and comfort the wounded. Prophecy served the gathered church directly because it communicated truth in a way everyone could grasp. Paul is not pitting one gift against another; he is showing that love determines when and how each gift should be used.

This is why he urges them to “pursue love” relentlessly while still seeking to offer the gifts. Love is what teaches a believer to choose the right gift for the right moment. Love asks, Who will benefit from this? Who will understand? Who will be strengthened? Love refuses to use a gift merely to display spiritual status or gain admiration. Love directs every gift toward the gospel’s advance and the church’s good.

The Corinthians had been using their linguistic abilities as bragging rights, a way to appear spiritually elite. Paul redirects them toward a better way: gifts are not for self‑promotion but for service. When exercised in love, even the most spectacular gift becomes a tool for mission. When exercised without love, even the most impressive gift becomes empty.

Paul’s vision is simple and searching: the Spirit gives gifts for the sake of others, and love is what ensures they are used that way.

LORD, show us how to give you our gifts, while not offending each other.

Posted in church, love, spiritual gifts | Tagged | Leave a comment

mystery in the mirror

May 2016 (13)

1 Corinthians 13:11-13

1Co 13:11 When I was a minor, I spoke like a minor, I thought like a minor, I reasoned like a minor. When I became a man, I put aside the things associated with my having been a minor.
1Co 13:12 Because now we see an enigma when we look into a mirror, but later we will see face to face. Now I know piecemeal, later I will really know, just like I am really known.
1Co 13:13 But as it is, these three things last: faith, hope, and love; and love is the greater of these.

mystery in the mirror

Paul brings the Corinthians back to a sober, humbling truth: even the most dazzling gifts they celebrated were only partial, temporary expressions of what God would one day complete in them. Their enthusiasm for gifted leaders and spectacular manifestations had inflated their sense of spiritual maturity. Paul does not scold them for valuing the gifts; he simply reminds them that the gifts are not the finish line. They are early tools, suited for an early stage of growth.

He points them toward a future maturity—a time when the church will no longer see dim reflections but will see Christ clearly. In that future, the gifts they prize will no longer be necessary. Prophecy, tongues, and knowledge all belong to the era of partial understanding. They are good, but they are not permanent. Paul even includes himself in this limitation. He acknowledges that he, too, knows only in part. He cannot yet see himself as Christ sees him. His own identity, calling, and future glory remain mysteries that only full maturity will reveal.

This admission is striking. If Paul, with all his insight and experience, confesses his need to grow, how much more should the Corinthians temper their pride. Paul invites them to shift their focus from the temporary brilliance of gifts to the enduring qualities that mark true maturity. Gifts belong to the present age; virtues belong to the age to come.

So he directs their attention to three enduring qualities: faith, hope, and love. These are not spectacular. They do not draw crowds or create rivalries. They do not elevate one believer over another. Yet they are the qualities that will remain when the gifts have served their purpose. Faith will continue until sight replaces it. Hope will continue until fulfillment arrives. And love—love will continue forever.

Among these three, Paul says, love is the greatest. Not because faith and hope are unimportant, but because love alone belongs fully to both the present and the future. Love is the character of Christ himself. Love is the atmosphere of the coming kingdom. Love is the one virtue that will never be outgrown.

Paul’s message to the Corinthians is clear: pursue the gifts, but do not mistake them for maturity. The gifts will fade. Love will not. And only love can carry the church toward the fullness of what it will one day be in Christ.

LORD, make us more and more like the mature believers that you see, when you look at us through eternal eyes.

Posted in discipleship, faith, hope, love, spiritual gifts | Tagged | Leave a comment