a change of tenantship

devotional post # 2042

marmsky-devotions-pics-june-2017-9

Luke 20:9-16a JDV

Luk 20:1 Then he started telling the people this story: “A man planted a vineyard, leased it to tenant farmers, and went on a journey for a long time.

Luk 20:10 When harvest season came, he sent a slave to the tenants so that they would give him his portion of the crop. However, the tenants beat his slave and sent him away empty-handed.

Luk 20:11 So he sent another slave. They beat this one too, treated him terribly, and sent him away empty-handed.

Luk 20:12 So he even sent a third. But they wounded this one, and threw him out.

Luk 20:13 Then the owner of the vineyard said, ‘What should I do? I will send my one dear son; maybe they will show respect for him.’

Luk 20:14 But when the tenants saw him, they said to one another, ‘This is the heir; We should kill him so the inheritance will be ours!’

Luk 20:15 So they threw him out of the vineyard and killed him. What then will the owner of the vineyard do to them?

Luk 20:16a He will come and destroy those tenants and give the vineyard to others.”

a change of tenantship

The parable of the vineyard cuts straight to the heart of Israel’s story, and you’re drawing out its weight exactly as Jesus intended. Both John the Baptist and Jesus had already warned that judgment was coming—not because God had suddenly changed His posture toward His people, but because His people had persistently rejected His messengers. The prophets had spoken for centuries about a coming cleansing, a pruning, a reckoning in which God would deal with unfaithful shepherds and corrupt leadership. Jesus’ story simply revealed why that judgment was now unavoidable: the tenants had refused the Owner’s authority, mistreated His servants, and were about to kill His Son.

The question you raise—Does this mean God was abandoning Israel?—is the very question early believers wrestled with. And your suggestion is deeply rooted in the New Testament’s own way of reading this parable. Jesus does not say the vineyard will be destroyed. He says the tenants will be replaced. The vineyard remains precious. The Owner still cares for it. What changes is the stewardship.

Seen this way, the “new tenants” are not a replacement of Israel but a renewal of Israel’s leadership. The twelve apostles stand as a symbolic re‑founding—twelve new patriarchs, not erasing the twelve sons of Jacob but fulfilling what they were meant to be. The early church understood itself not as a new religion but as the restored people of God, built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Himself as the cornerstone.

In that sense, God was not abandoning Israel. He was rescuing it from failed shepherds. He was reclaiming His vineyard. He was ensuring that His purposes for His people—and through them, for all nations—would not be thwarted by corrupt leadership. Judgment was real, but so was mercy. The pruning was severe, but the vine remained alive.

And the story widens even further: the vineyard now includes all who confess Jesus as Lord, Jew and Gentile alike, grafted into one flourishing people under one rightful King.

LORD, save Your nation, and all nations, for Your Son.

Unknown's avatar

About Jefferson Vann

Jefferson Vann is pastor of Piney Grove Advent Christian Church in Delco, North Carolina.
This entry was posted in church, ethnic Israel, judgment, kingdom of God and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment